393 lines
14 KiB
XML
393 lines
14 KiB
XML
|
<?xml version="1.0"?>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<ruleset name="Multithreading"
|
||
|
xmlns="http://pmd.sourceforge.net/ruleset/2.0.0"
|
||
|
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
|
||
|
xsi:schemaLocation="http://pmd.sourceforge.net/ruleset/2.0.0 https://pmd.sourceforge.io/ruleset_2_0_0.xsd">
|
||
|
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Rules that flag issues when dealing with multiple threads of execution.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="AvoidSynchronizedAtMethodLevel"
|
||
|
language="java"
|
||
|
since="3.0"
|
||
|
message="Use block level rather than method level synchronization"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.rule.XPathRule"
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#avoidsynchronizedatmethodlevel">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Method-level synchronization can cause problems when new code is added to the method.
|
||
|
Block-level synchronization helps to ensure that only the code that needs synchronization
|
||
|
gets it.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>3</priority>
|
||
|
<properties>
|
||
|
<property name="xpath">
|
||
|
<value>//MethodDeclaration[@Synchronized='true']</value>
|
||
|
</property>
|
||
|
</properties>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
public class Foo {
|
||
|
// Try to avoid this:
|
||
|
synchronized void foo() {
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
// Prefer this:
|
||
|
void bar() {
|
||
|
synchronized(this) {
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Try to avoid this for static methods:
|
||
|
static synchronized void fooStatic() {
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Prefer this:
|
||
|
static void barStatic() {
|
||
|
synchronized(Foo.class) {
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="AvoidThreadGroup"
|
||
|
language="java"
|
||
|
since="3.6"
|
||
|
message="Avoid using java.lang.ThreadGroup; it is not thread safe"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.rule.XPathRule"
|
||
|
typeResolution="true"
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#avoidthreadgroup">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Avoid using java.lang.ThreadGroup; although it is intended to be used in a threaded environment
|
||
|
it contains methods that are not thread-safe.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>3</priority>
|
||
|
<properties>
|
||
|
<property name="xpath">
|
||
|
<value>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
//AllocationExpression/ClassOrInterfaceType[pmd-java:typeIs('java.lang.ThreadGroup')]|
|
||
|
//PrimarySuffix[contains(@Image, 'getThreadGroup')]
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</value>
|
||
|
</property>
|
||
|
</properties>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
public class Bar {
|
||
|
void buz() {
|
||
|
ThreadGroup tg = new ThreadGroup("My threadgroup");
|
||
|
tg = new ThreadGroup(tg, "my thread group");
|
||
|
tg = Thread.currentThread().getThreadGroup();
|
||
|
tg = System.getSecurityManager().getThreadGroup();
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="AvoidUsingVolatile"
|
||
|
language="java"
|
||
|
since="4.1"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.rule.XPathRule"
|
||
|
message="Use of modifier volatile is not recommended."
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#avoidusingvolatile">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Use of the keyword 'volatile' is generally used to fine tune a Java application, and therefore, requires
|
||
|
a good expertise of the Java Memory Model. Moreover, its range of action is somewhat misknown. Therefore,
|
||
|
the volatile keyword should not be used for maintenance purpose and portability.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>2</priority>
|
||
|
<properties>
|
||
|
<property name="xpath">
|
||
|
<value>//FieldDeclaration[contains(@Volatile,'true')]</value>
|
||
|
</property>
|
||
|
</properties>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
public class ThrDeux {
|
||
|
private volatile String var1; // not suggested
|
||
|
private String var2; // preferred
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="DoNotUseThreads"
|
||
|
language="java"
|
||
|
since="4.1"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.rule.XPathRule"
|
||
|
message="To be compliant to J2EE, a webapp should not use any thread."
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#donotusethreads">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
The J2EE specification explicitly forbids the use of threads.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>3</priority>
|
||
|
<properties>
|
||
|
<property name="xpath">
|
||
|
<value>//ClassOrInterfaceType[@Image = 'Thread' or @Image = 'Runnable']</value>
|
||
|
</property>
|
||
|
</properties>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
// This is not allowed
|
||
|
public class UsingThread extends Thread {
|
||
|
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Neither this,
|
||
|
public class OtherThread implements Runnable {
|
||
|
// Nor this ...
|
||
|
public void methode() {
|
||
|
Runnable thread = new Thread(); thread.run();
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="DontCallThreadRun"
|
||
|
language="java"
|
||
|
since="4.3"
|
||
|
message="Don't call Thread.run() explicitly, use Thread.start()"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.rule.XPathRule"
|
||
|
typeResolution="true"
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#dontcallthreadrun">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Explicitly calling Thread.run() method will execute in the caller's thread of control. Instead, call Thread.start() for the intended behavior.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>4</priority>
|
||
|
<properties>
|
||
|
<property name="xpath">
|
||
|
<value>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
//StatementExpression/PrimaryExpression
|
||
|
[
|
||
|
PrimaryPrefix
|
||
|
[
|
||
|
./Name[ends-with(@Image, '.run') or @Image = 'run']
|
||
|
and substring-before(Name/@Image, '.') =//VariableDeclarator/VariableDeclaratorId/@Image
|
||
|
[../../../Type/ReferenceType/ClassOrInterfaceType[pmd-java:typeIs('java.lang.Thread')]]
|
||
|
or (./AllocationExpression/ClassOrInterfaceType[pmd-java:typeIs('java.lang.Thread')]
|
||
|
and ../PrimarySuffix[@Image = 'run'])
|
||
|
]
|
||
|
]
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</value>
|
||
|
</property>
|
||
|
</properties>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
Thread t = new Thread();
|
||
|
t.run(); // use t.start() instead
|
||
|
new Thread().run(); // same violation
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="DoubleCheckedLocking"
|
||
|
language="java"
|
||
|
since="1.04"
|
||
|
message="Double checked locking is not thread safe in Java."
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.multithreading.DoubleCheckedLockingRule"
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#doublecheckedlocking">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Partially created objects can be returned by the Double Checked Locking pattern when used in Java.
|
||
|
An optimizing JRE may assign a reference to the baz variable before it calls the constructor of the object the
|
||
|
reference points to.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Note: With Java 5, you can make Double checked locking work, if you declare the variable to be `volatile`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For more details refer to: <http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-02-2001/jw-0209-double.html>
|
||
|
or <http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/DoubleCheckedLocking.html>
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>1</priority>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
public class Foo {
|
||
|
/*volatile */ Object baz = null; // fix for Java5 and later: volatile
|
||
|
Object bar() {
|
||
|
if (baz == null) { // baz may be non-null yet not fully created
|
||
|
synchronized(this) {
|
||
|
if (baz == null) {
|
||
|
baz = new Object();
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
return baz;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="NonThreadSafeSingleton"
|
||
|
since="3.4"
|
||
|
message="Singleton is not thread safe"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.multithreading.NonThreadSafeSingletonRule"
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#nonthreadsafesingleton">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Non-thread safe singletons can result in bad state changes. Eliminate
|
||
|
static singletons if possible by instantiating the object directly. Static
|
||
|
singletons are usually not needed as only a single instance exists anyway.
|
||
|
Other possible fixes are to synchronize the entire method or to use an
|
||
|
[initialize-on-demand holder class](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initialization-on-demand_holder_idiom).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Refrain from using the double-checked locking pattern. The Java Memory Model doesn't
|
||
|
guarantee it to work unless the variable is declared as `volatile`, adding an uneeded
|
||
|
performance penalty. [Reference](http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/DoubleCheckedLocking.html)
|
||
|
|
||
|
See Effective Java, item 48.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>3</priority>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
private static Foo foo = null;
|
||
|
|
||
|
//multiple simultaneous callers may see partially initialized objects
|
||
|
public static Foo getFoo() {
|
||
|
if (foo==null) {
|
||
|
foo = new Foo();
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
return foo;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="UnsynchronizedStaticDateFormatter"
|
||
|
since="3.6"
|
||
|
deprecated="true"
|
||
|
message="Static DateFormatter objects should be accessed in a synchronized manner"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.multithreading.UnsynchronizedStaticDateFormatterRule"
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#unsynchronizedstaticdateformatter">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
SimpleDateFormat instances are not synchronized. Sun recommends using separate format instances
|
||
|
for each thread. If multiple threads must access a static formatter, the formatter must be
|
||
|
synchronized either on method or block level.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This rule has been deprecated in favor of the rule {% rule UnsynchronizedStaticFormatter %}.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>3</priority>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
public class Foo {
|
||
|
private static final SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat();
|
||
|
void bar() {
|
||
|
sdf.format(); // poor, no thread-safety
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
synchronized void foo() {
|
||
|
sdf.format(); // preferred
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="UnsynchronizedStaticFormatter"
|
||
|
since="6.11.0"
|
||
|
message="Static Formatter objects should be accessed in a synchronized manner"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.multithreading.UnsynchronizedStaticFormatterRule"
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#unsynchronizedstaticformatter">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Instances of `java.text.Format` are generally not synchronized.
|
||
|
Sun recommends using separate format instances for each thread.
|
||
|
If multiple threads must access a static formatter, the formatter must be
|
||
|
synchronized either on method or block level.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>3</priority>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
public class Foo {
|
||
|
private static final SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat();
|
||
|
void bar() {
|
||
|
sdf.format(); // poor, no thread-safety
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
synchronized void foo() {
|
||
|
sdf.format(); // preferred
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="UseConcurrentHashMap"
|
||
|
language="java"
|
||
|
minimumLanguageVersion="1.5"
|
||
|
since="4.2.6"
|
||
|
message="If you run in Java5 or newer and have concurrent access, you should use the ConcurrentHashMap implementation"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.rule.XPathRule"
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#useconcurrenthashmap">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Since Java5 brought a new implementation of the Map designed for multi-threaded access, you can
|
||
|
perform efficient map reads without blocking other threads.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>3</priority>
|
||
|
<properties>
|
||
|
<property name="xpath">
|
||
|
<value>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
//Type[../VariableDeclarator/VariableInitializer//AllocationExpression/ClassOrInterfaceType[@Image != 'ConcurrentHashMap']]
|
||
|
/ReferenceType/ClassOrInterfaceType[@Image = 'Map']
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</value>
|
||
|
</property>
|
||
|
</properties>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
public class ConcurrentApp {
|
||
|
public void getMyInstance() {
|
||
|
Map map1 = new HashMap(); // fine for single-threaded access
|
||
|
Map map2 = new ConcurrentHashMap(); // preferred for use with multiple threads
|
||
|
|
||
|
// the following case will be ignored by this rule
|
||
|
Map map3 = someModule.methodThatReturnMap(); // might be OK, if the returned map is already thread-safe
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<rule name="UseNotifyAllInsteadOfNotify"
|
||
|
language="java"
|
||
|
since="3.0"
|
||
|
message="Call Thread.notifyAll() rather than Thread.notify()"
|
||
|
class="net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.rule.XPathRule"
|
||
|
externalInfoUrl="${pmd.website.baseurl}/pmd_rules_java_multithreading.html#usenotifyallinsteadofnotify">
|
||
|
<description>
|
||
|
Thread.notify() awakens a thread monitoring the object. If more than one thread is monitoring, then only
|
||
|
one is chosen. The thread chosen is arbitrary; thus its usually safer to call notifyAll() instead.
|
||
|
</description>
|
||
|
<priority>3</priority>
|
||
|
<properties>
|
||
|
<property name="xpath">
|
||
|
<value>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
//StatementExpression/PrimaryExpression
|
||
|
[PrimarySuffix/Arguments[@ArgumentCount = '0']]
|
||
|
[
|
||
|
PrimaryPrefix[
|
||
|
./Name[@Image='notify' or ends-with(@Image,'.notify')]
|
||
|
or ../PrimarySuffix/@Image='notify'
|
||
|
or (./AllocationExpression and ../PrimarySuffix[@Image='notify'])
|
||
|
]
|
||
|
]
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</value>
|
||
|
</property>
|
||
|
</properties>
|
||
|
<example>
|
||
|
<![CDATA[
|
||
|
void bar() {
|
||
|
x.notify();
|
||
|
// If many threads are monitoring x, only one (and you won't know which) will be notified.
|
||
|
// use instead:
|
||
|
x.notifyAll();
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]]>
|
||
|
</example>
|
||
|
</rule>
|
||
|
|
||
|
</ruleset>
|